The Scare Factor
Skip Navigation LinksHome > Explanation View State:

Explanation of The Scare Factor Review System

Each review for The Scare Factor is performed by a “Scream Team”. The reviews are divided into 8 categories. The average of these scores results in the overall “Scare Factor.”

The rating system is:

NA = Not Applicable
1-2 Screams = Unsatisfactory
3-4 Screams = Poor to Below Average
5-6 Screams = Average to Above Average
7-8 Screams = Good to Very Good
9-10 Screams = Exceptional


The categories are:

  • Cast
  • Make-up and Costuming
  • Customer Service
  • Atmosphere
  • Special Effects
  • Theme
  • Fright Effect
  • Value

Comparing Reviews

The Scare Factor is unique in its approach to reviewing Haunted Attractions. A standardized review system is used by all our teams. Also, an orientation with training is given to our teams. Additionally, each review is read over by a general editor and one of the owners. While we cannot eliminate the subjectivity of a team, we can and do work to minimize it. Another factor to be considered when comparing reviews is the experience of the team reviewing. The more years and attractions reviewed by a team the more solid and objective their review will be. Here is a guide to team experience:

The Founding Team

This team is made up of the founding members of The Scare Factor. This team has a great deal of experience at rating haunted attractions and a knowledge of the industry. Their reviews, are consequently, among the most in depth and demanding offered by The Scare Factor and in the industry.

Veteran Team

This team has at least one year of experience. They are growing in their ability and experience in reviewing haunted attractions. They are also increasing their knowledge base through increased training. With each year under their belt, their reviews are expected to increase in depth and objectivity.

Apprentice Team

An apprentice team is in their first year of reviewing haunted attractions. Through the interview process, the team has demonstrated a passion for the industry and a willingness to be coached. While no review is posted if it is felt to be inaccurate, first year review team scores may be more volatile than those of experienced teams. Given a successful first year, an apprentice team is invited back to become a veteran team.